Taxation must be a two-way street

Publish: 5:44 PM, June 16, 2022 | Update: 5:44 PM, June 16, 2022

A government needs resources to take up various projects and programmes in the social and developmental sectors. The resources in large measures are supposed to be mobilised as taxes given by people and organisations. But as everyone concerned probably knows it in Bangladesh, the taxes collected by the government in different areas are pitiably low compared to the potential. But citizens also have points to raise about government not spending their tax money as efficiently as it should or the hardships it may create on sections of people from the move to extend the net for taxation.
Nonetheless, the fact remains that the base of taxation remains rather narrow and enlargement of it is very important and would be justified to augment tax collection. More significantly, the augmentation requires revamping, modernisation and reforms of the tax administration.
Plans should be on the drawing board and their execution need to be early to modernise the entire tax administration. The same is necessary for the obvious reasons of securing revenue collection on a long lasting basis. But the expected upgradation of the taxation machinery and the contemplated actions to expand the taxation base, are yet not seen though these measures would be vital for the government to maintain the high level of its desired spending in various social and developmental programmes.
Before engaging in any reforms in taxation, it appears very necessary that people or institutions should be made aware of the need to pay taxes. There are many people and businesses who are able to pay taxes but do not pay or pay in proportion as they feel no guilt associated to non payment or insufficient payment of taxes. Furthermore, the present system has deliberately kept many gaps to facilitate tax evasion. The culture is rather ascendant that tax evasion is the smarter or appropriate thing to do than its opposite. A truly informative and persuasive campaign should precede any move to impose new taxes or purposefully increase the number of new taxpayers. People must be convinced first of the merit of paying taxes and they would also require some assurance that their tax money would be well spent. Only then their motivation to pay taxes can rise.
The efficiency of the taxation machinery depends considerably on retraining the taxmen on modern lines. They can be trained in countries where the tax administrations are efficient. But there should be also recognition that without a substantial follow up revamping of organisations, procedures and methods of administration, much of the training would be wasted. Specially, the tax administration needs to acquire real capacity in the intelligence and enforcement areas.
Stepped up activities to collect more taxes can prove to be successful in a setting where new investment operations in the economy, the dynamic running of established enterprises or the general health of the economy is a sound one. In such a situation of accelerated economic activities leading to wealth and income creation, taxmen may not have difficulty in finding taxable enterprises or individuals. Individuals and organisation in such a setting are also found more cooperative or willing to pay taxes from their having adequate resources to do so. But the economic activities are currently in a slowdown mood. People can of course be arm twisted into paying taxes. But that would mean a form of repression. Instead of sending out taxmen to squeeze out more taxes from individuals and institutions to pay more taxes, government should rather adopt policies that would restore the confidence of businesses leading to the invigoration of the economy. Collecting more taxes then would not prove to be either an oppressive exercise or face lack of cooperation from the potential taxpayers.
The present year’s budget has been just presented in parliament. There are proposals in it for increasing taxes on some goods and services in it. But its final adoption is still about a month away. Some proposed taxes may be readjusted or cut finally after consideration and scrutiny. But how is the market situation. Already, sellers of various goods and services have slapped much higher prices on these goods and services on the plea that the budget has proposed higher prices or charges for them.
So, whose duty is it to tell these market players not to irrationally or whimsically demand higher prices or charges from consumers on the excuse of the budget just proposing higher prices or charges for them. Besides, it is a custom like phenomenon in Bangladesh that any price or charge hiked on any ground or no ground remains unchanged later on and none feels the obligation to right these wrongs. Should not our budget makers look at these injustices with the aim to right them for good ?